Skip to main content

Map Typography

This module explored the use of typography in map-making. For this assignment, I had to label larger cities/islands, waterways, parks, landmarks, neighborhoods, and topographical features in San Francisco, California. 

My thought process for labeling Map 1 below is as follows. 

General cities and islands: I used basic large black font, for these main locations' features to stand out. I placed them centrally, in a spot they wouldn’t block other features. I used a blockier font (century gothic) for easier legibility.

Water Features: I used italicized blue font to signify water. I used a lighter blue for the Pacific Ocean, as it’s not local information. I used the font commonly used for water features, Bodoni MT Italic, for distinction and legibility.

Park Names: I used a green front placed above the area of the parks. I used a blockier font (century gothic) for easier legibility.

Landmarks: I used a bright orange to stand out and placed it over the bridge. I used a blockier font (century gothic) for easier legibility.

Topo features and neighborhoods: I boxed in the areas and placed a black label inside. For the mountain, I placed a curved label over the feature. I used the default font to differentiate it from the other features.

I also used a larger poster size to make the smaller neighborhoods and parks easier to see. 


Below are additional maps completed in this module:









Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Utilizing ERDAS Imagine to Analyze Map Features

 This week we learned how to utilize histograms and different bands to highlight different features in a map. On the following map that we worked on, dark bodies of water caused high peaks on the left of histograms while snow-peaked mountains were small blips on the far right. These simple distinctions help to quickly identify map features on a graph, that you can then utilize as a stepping stone to finding them on the image. I found it incredibly interesting how the different band layers highlighted different features on the map. Figure 1 below depicts three different features we found on the image.  Figure 1: Distinct features found on an image using ERDAS Imagine. Feature 1: Large body of water. Feature 2: Snow-capped mountains transitioning to thick vegetation. Feature 3: Shallow turbulent body of water near urbanized land, transitioning to deep calm body of water. 

Positional Accuracy: NSSDA

 In this analysis, I compared the street and road intersect data collected for Alburquerque, NM by the City of Alburquerque and the application StreetMaps. I used an orthophoto base layer as the reference for this analysis, to compare and determine the accuracy of both the City and Streetmap layers using NSSDA procedures. The most difficult part of this analysis for me was how to determine what 20% per quadrant looks like. Because the reference map was divided into 208 quadrants, I had to determine how to subdivide all the quadrant's equality into 20%. After multiple trials and error, I decided to subdivide the entire area (208 sub-quadrants) into 4 equal-area subsections. In this way, I could do 5 random right intersection points per subsection or 20% per subsection.  Map 1: City of Albuquerque city map data.  Map 2: City of Alburquerque SteetMap data When selecting a random intersection to place the points within each quadrant, I choose a location that had data f...

Scale Effect and Spatial Data Aggregation

 In this lab we first looked at how the scale at which we analyze data can affect geometric properties. Looking at data at three different scales (1:1200, 1:24000, 1:100000) I was surprised by my final calculations. I thought that there would be a lineal proportional relationship along the scales, but I did not find this. It makes sense that the greatest resolution [1:1200] would have the most detail of geometric properties, but I was surprised that 1:100000 had greater geometric properties than the medium resolution. I resampled the data using the Bilinear technique and found the following effect on DEM resolution.  As DEM resolution increases the average slope in degrees decreases. This makes sense because as you get closer, more in detail by getting closer, you are zooming in as actively seeing less features altogether.  In the last part of the lab, we looked into the Gerrymandering of districts in the USA. Gerrymandering essentially breaks up congressional distri...