Skip to main content

Interpolation

In this assignment, we learned about four different interpolation methods: Thiessen, IDW, and Spline Regularized/Tension. We used these methods to analyze the Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) in milligrams per Liter in the Tampa Bay of Florida. 

The first method, Thiessen interpolation, is a widely used method mainly because of its ease of use and high accuracy when using a large sampling density. Because this method assigns a value based on the nearest sample point, it does not do well with continuous data. However, because of this same attribute, this method can be highly beneficial when dealing with data that is oddly shaped or ends abruptly.

Model 1: Thiessen

IDW interpolation draws in the theory that points closer to each other are more alike. 

Model 2: IDW

The biggest difference in the Spline layer from the other two methods is it has a much smoother expression. This makes sense as the spline interpolation runs through each data point and aims to smooth out the surface elevation. In this step, I encountered an error in the model. A section of the Tampa Bay model showed a high level of BOD that did not make sense. This issue is discussed further below. 

Model 3: Spline

A high BOD concentration signifies that there is less oxygen in the environment due to decomposing organisms and a sign of low water quality. Because the area noted below is a natural park and wetland area this can make sense; assuming that decaying biological fauna and folia are present in the area and causing the low water quality. However, because there are also plenty of live plants to add oxygen back to the environment, I would have to question the health of this local wetland ecosystem. This would also explain the lack of sampling points if this is a protected area. That being said, because spline interpolation runs through every point of data, aims to create a smooth surface, and there are no sharp slope changes in Tampa Bay it makes sense that it would make this area relatively high (if drawing solely on points nearby) and create a false positive.  



I suspect that the error seen in the Tampa Bay estuary is also due to the fact that points 25 and 29 are very close to each other with significantly different numbers. Spline aims to create a smooth surface and having two very close points with different values [2.2 and 1.16] confused the interpolation. I first decided to delete point 25 [2.2] to get rid of this error. However, when I used the Spline tool it would not run and stated there was not enough points. So, I then changed the value of point 25 to that of 29 [1.16]. This drastically changed the Spline outcome as seen below. 


Moving forward, I would choose the IDW model because it bases the model on the assumption that points closer to each other are more related. This model makes sense in Tampa Bay because there may be many changes due to boat traffic, estuary outputs, and environmental runoff. 


 





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bivariate Choropleth and Proportional Symbols

In the first part of this lab, we used proportional symbols to represent positive and negative values in job increases/decreases in the USA.  Because there were negative values in this data set, I created a new map to "fix" the data. In this new map, I created a new field and copied the negative job loss data. I then used the Calculate field data and multiplied it by one to make it positive. Lastly, I overlaid both maps on the data and was able to accurately represent the increase and decrease of jobs in the USA by state.   In the second part of this lab, we delved into how to prepare data for a bivariate choropleth map, choose colors for the legend, and create a good layout.  I created three separate fields to analyze the data: Class Obese, Class Inactivity, and Class Final. I used the symbology tool to create 3 Quantile for the Obese and Inactivity classes and used each quantile to set the three classifications in the fields I created using the Select by Attributes tool to

Infographic's

 This week was a fun and challenging week as we learned about and created infographics. It was fun to create the infographics themselves, but challenging to figure out the best methods and practices in analyzing raw data.  We used 2018 County Health Rankings National Data from countyhealthrankings.org. I chose to move forward with the two values: Unhealthy Mental Days and Premature Dealth.  I   choose these two variables because those that struggle with mental health die before their time due to depression, anxiety, and/or a combination of similar issues. Both variables are normalized by relating their value to all counties within each state in the USA. For example, the poor mental health days is normalized as the average number of reported mentally unhealthy days per month per ctizen. The normalized premature rate is the “age-adjusted years of potential life lost rate per 100,000.”  Below, I created a scatterplot of the normalized data.  I choose to keep the scatterplot in a pretty tr

Color and Choropleths

This lab was very interesting as we dived into color theory.  In the first part of the lab, we created and compared linear and adjusted progression color ramps to themselves as well as a color ramp from the website colorbrewer.org.  I found, the colorbrewer color ramps are not as rhythmic when compared to the other methods, as they don’t step up at set intervals or rates. However, I don’t think that a set rate is needed to go from color to color. I preferred the colorbrewer ramp because each color was distinct from its neighbors. In the linear and adjusted color ramps, the colors looked too similar to each other and were not distinct enough for each step. I think that as long as the color ramp is moving in the opposite direction of the same color hue, the step rate or interval is not as relevant. When I first was completing the linear step I started with the purple hue option but had a difficult time, as each step in the color ramp looked the same. At one point, I created my own color