Skip to main content

Interpolation

In this assignment, we learned about four different interpolation methods: Thiessen, IDW, and Spline Regularized/Tension. We used these methods to analyze the Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) in milligrams per Liter in the Tampa Bay of Florida. 

The first method, Thiessen interpolation, is a widely used method mainly because of its ease of use and high accuracy when using a large sampling density. Because this method assigns a value based on the nearest sample point, it does not do well with continuous data. However, because of this same attribute, this method can be highly beneficial when dealing with data that is oddly shaped or ends abruptly.

Model 1: Thiessen

IDW interpolation draws in the theory that points closer to each other are more alike. 

Model 2: IDW

The biggest difference in the Spline layer from the other two methods is it has a much smoother expression. This makes sense as the spline interpolation runs through each data point and aims to smooth out the surface elevation. In this step, I encountered an error in the model. A section of the Tampa Bay model showed a high level of BOD that did not make sense. This issue is discussed further below. 

Model 3: Spline

A high BOD concentration signifies that there is less oxygen in the environment due to decomposing organisms and a sign of low water quality. Because the area noted below is a natural park and wetland area this can make sense; assuming that decaying biological fauna and folia are present in the area and causing the low water quality. However, because there are also plenty of live plants to add oxygen back to the environment, I would have to question the health of this local wetland ecosystem. This would also explain the lack of sampling points if this is a protected area. That being said, because spline interpolation runs through every point of data, aims to create a smooth surface, and there are no sharp slope changes in Tampa Bay it makes sense that it would make this area relatively high (if drawing solely on points nearby) and create a false positive.  



I suspect that the error seen in the Tampa Bay estuary is also due to the fact that points 25 and 29 are very close to each other with significantly different numbers. Spline aims to create a smooth surface and having two very close points with different values [2.2 and 1.16] confused the interpolation. I first decided to delete point 25 [2.2] to get rid of this error. However, when I used the Spline tool it would not run and stated there was not enough points. So, I then changed the value of point 25 to that of 29 [1.16]. This drastically changed the Spline outcome as seen below. 


Moving forward, I would choose the IDW model because it bases the model on the assumption that points closer to each other are more related. This model makes sense in Tampa Bay because there may be many changes due to boat traffic, estuary outputs, and environmental runoff. 


 





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Positional Accuracy: NSSDA

 In this analysis, I compared the street and road intersect data collected for Alburquerque, NM by the City of Alburquerque and the application StreetMaps. I used an orthophoto base layer as the reference for this analysis, to compare and determine the accuracy of both the City and Streetmap layers using NSSDA procedures. The most difficult part of this analysis for me was how to determine what 20% per quadrant looks like. Because the reference map was divided into 208 quadrants, I had to determine how to subdivide all the quadrant's equality into 20%. After multiple trials and error, I decided to subdivide the entire area (208 sub-quadrants) into 4 equal-area subsections. In this way, I could do 5 random right intersection points per subsection or 20% per subsection.  Map 1: City of Albuquerque city map data.  Map 2: City of Alburquerque SteetMap data When selecting a random intersection to place the points within each quadrant, I choose a location that had data f...

Isarithmic Mapping

  Map 1: Annual Precipitation, Washington State Map 1 is an Isarithmic map that follows the continuous phenomenon of rainfall in Washington state over a 30 year period. The data was created by the PRISM group at the Oregon State University in 2006, and then downloaded and amended by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Geospatial Management Center in 2012. Eden Santiago Gomez, analyzed the data on 5/2/2021, to create the map above. Santiago Gomez created continuous tones for the data, also adding a hillshade effect. She then converted the floating raster data into Integer data via the geoprocessing tool Int (Spatial Analyst Tool) to bring out hypsometric tinting. Lastly, she added contours of the data via the Contour List tool.   How the precipitation data was derived and interpolated? The PRISM system has been continually developed over the past couple decades, utilizing physiographical maps and climate fingerprints as its ...

Choropleth and Dot Mapping

 This week we explored choropleth and dot mapping. Choropleth is a thematic form of mapping that focuses on color units, whose color intensity is proportional to its corresponding data value. Dot mapping is also thematic. It uses either a proportional or graduated thematic symbol (like a circle), whose size increases due to its data value. Using ArcGIS pro, I analyzed the population densities of countries in Europe (person per square kilometer), as well as their wine consumption (liters per capita) to determine if there was a correlation between the two. In my choropleth map, I decided to use a natural breaks classification. I chose not to use Equal Interval because only 2 classes (with slight 3 rd class) were represented in the map, and it looked like almost just one color in the lower range. The standard deviation classification appeared to be more diverse at first glance but was actually skewed to the top ranges. I was then between Quantile and Natural Breaks. While both t...