Skip to main content

Interpolation

In this assignment, we learned about four different interpolation methods: Thiessen, IDW, and Spline Regularized/Tension. We used these methods to analyze the Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) in milligrams per Liter in the Tampa Bay of Florida. 

The first method, Thiessen interpolation, is a widely used method mainly because of its ease of use and high accuracy when using a large sampling density. Because this method assigns a value based on the nearest sample point, it does not do well with continuous data. However, because of this same attribute, this method can be highly beneficial when dealing with data that is oddly shaped or ends abruptly.

Model 1: Thiessen

IDW interpolation draws in the theory that points closer to each other are more alike. 

Model 2: IDW

The biggest difference in the Spline layer from the other two methods is it has a much smoother expression. This makes sense as the spline interpolation runs through each data point and aims to smooth out the surface elevation. In this step, I encountered an error in the model. A section of the Tampa Bay model showed a high level of BOD that did not make sense. This issue is discussed further below. 

Model 3: Spline

A high BOD concentration signifies that there is less oxygen in the environment due to decomposing organisms and a sign of low water quality. Because the area noted below is a natural park and wetland area this can make sense; assuming that decaying biological fauna and folia are present in the area and causing the low water quality. However, because there are also plenty of live plants to add oxygen back to the environment, I would have to question the health of this local wetland ecosystem. This would also explain the lack of sampling points if this is a protected area. That being said, because spline interpolation runs through every point of data, aims to create a smooth surface, and there are no sharp slope changes in Tampa Bay it makes sense that it would make this area relatively high (if drawing solely on points nearby) and create a false positive.  



I suspect that the error seen in the Tampa Bay estuary is also due to the fact that points 25 and 29 are very close to each other with significantly different numbers. Spline aims to create a smooth surface and having two very close points with different values [2.2 and 1.16] confused the interpolation. I first decided to delete point 25 [2.2] to get rid of this error. However, when I used the Spline tool it would not run and stated there was not enough points. So, I then changed the value of point 25 to that of 29 [1.16]. This drastically changed the Spline outcome as seen below. 


Moving forward, I would choose the IDW model because it bases the model on the assumption that points closer to each other are more related. This model makes sense in Tampa Bay because there may be many changes due to boat traffic, estuary outputs, and environmental runoff. 


 





Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Utilizing ERDAS Imagine to Analyze Map Features

 This week we learned how to utilize histograms and different bands to highlight different features in a map. On the following map that we worked on, dark bodies of water caused high peaks on the left of histograms while snow-peaked mountains were small blips on the far right. These simple distinctions help to quickly identify map features on a graph, that you can then utilize as a stepping stone to finding them on the image. I found it incredibly interesting how the different band layers highlighted different features on the map. Figure 1 below depicts three different features we found on the image.  Figure 1: Distinct features found on an image using ERDAS Imagine. Feature 1: Large body of water. Feature 2: Snow-capped mountains transitioning to thick vegetation. Feature 3: Shallow turbulent body of water near urbanized land, transitioning to deep calm body of water. 
Post a Comment
Read more

Positional Accuracy: NSSDA

 In this analysis, I compared the street and road intersect data collected for Alburquerque, NM by the City of Alburquerque and the application StreetMaps. I used an orthophoto base layer as the reference for this analysis, to compare and determine the accuracy of both the City and Streetmap layers using NSSDA procedures. The most difficult part of this analysis for me was how to determine what 20% per quadrant looks like. Because the reference map was divided into 208 quadrants, I had to determine how to subdivide all the quadrant's equality into 20%. After multiple trials and error, I decided to subdivide the entire area (208 sub-quadrants) into 4 equal-area subsections. In this way, I could do 5 random right intersection points per subsection or 20% per subsection.  Map 1: City of Albuquerque city map data.  Map 2: City of Alburquerque SteetMap data When selecting a random intersection to place the points within each quadrant, I choose a location that had data f...
Post a Comment
Read more

Georeferencing, Editing, and Creating 3D Maps in ArcGIS Pro

 During the last week of Intro to GIS, we learned how to utilize control points on an unreferenced map layer. This provided georeferenced points on the originally unreferenced map layer, placing it correctly on top of baselayers while using RSME as a guide to accuracy. Additionally, we edited map layers to add newer construction elements in the form of buildings and roads that were not previously on the map. Lastly, a LAS dataset was used in a Scene Map to create a 3D map of the main campus location of the University of West Florida. Below are the final maps for each of these steps.  Figure 1: University of West Florida Main Campus Map. Ariel photographs georeferenced for accuracy, and new construction of gym building and Campus Lane edited into the map. A 330 and 660 ft buffer was also created around a protected eagles nest.  Figure 2: 3D map of the Main Campus of the University of West Florida. 
Post a Comment
Read more