Skip to main content

Module 3: Visibility Analysis

 This week for Module 3, I did four different training classes at ESRI.com regarding 3D data visualization and analysis.

The first training [3D Visualization] taught me how 3D data is represented, different elevation types (on the ground, relative to the ground, absolute height), and how to convert 2D data to 3D via extrusion. Numerical data can be extruded an attribute as z-value to make it 3D using base, min, max, or absolute value of a certain attribute. In the appearance tab -> extrusion group -> choose the field. In our exercise I also used Extrusion Expression to “see the features more clearly.” (ESRI) Additionally in this training, I used different marker types for 3D data like a basic tree, to procedural markers that are more realistic and specific to an given location, fill symbols like grass, and procedural fills “for cities with a well-known architectural style, procedural fills can help create a realistic set of buildings, along with other common city features, such as street light.” (ESRI) I thought it was cool that you could even change the Ocean/water fill symbol layer by degrees to reflect waves and water strength. Lastly, I played around with atmospheric and illumination effects. When using a global scene, you can change the lighting by time! For example, I can choose in the properties to change the lighting to 7p.

Picture 1: Example of 3D visualization for training 1.

 

In the second training, I performed line of sight analysis via the construct sight lines and line of sight tool. This was a fun training exercise, as I was able to create all the sight lines for the view points of a parade, and then narrow down the sight lines given distance. We added the data with the Add Z Info tool, and removed the lines of sight that didn’t met our criteria with the Delete Features tool.  

Picture 2: Example of line of sight analysis for a parade.

The third training was also fun; Viewshed analysis. Viewshed analysis is a bit more detailed then line of sight, as it considers any obstructions surrounding the observer’s point of view. So while line of sight, looks for a line between the observer and target that is unobstructed, viewshed looks at all the areas the observer can see. In the exercise, we looked at the illumination capability of camping areas given the current light provided by a lighting company. We used the viewshed tool and raster functions [greater than in this case] to define and meet our criteria.

Picture: Example for training 3. 


The last and fourth training I did was: Sharing 3D content. One random but very important tid-bit I learned was that you can use the V key and mouse to move among an ArcGIS Pro map in a 3D fashion. I previously struggled with moving into a 3D map, away from an aerial view. In this training, I learned how to use the Create 3D Object Scene Layer Package tool to upload the scene layer to arcgis and the steps to correctly publish the scene layer. 

Picture 4: Example for training 4. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Positional Accuracy: NSSDA

 In this analysis, I compared the street and road intersect data collected for Alburquerque, NM by the City of Alburquerque and the application StreetMaps. I used an orthophoto base layer as the reference for this analysis, to compare and determine the accuracy of both the City and Streetmap layers using NSSDA procedures. The most difficult part of this analysis for me was how to determine what 20% per quadrant looks like. Because the reference map was divided into 208 quadrants, I had to determine how to subdivide all the quadrant's equality into 20%. After multiple trials and error, I decided to subdivide the entire area (208 sub-quadrants) into 4 equal-area subsections. In this way, I could do 5 random right intersection points per subsection or 20% per subsection.  Map 1: City of Albuquerque city map data.  Map 2: City of Alburquerque SteetMap data When selecting a random intersection to place the points within each quadrant, I choose a location that had data f...

Isarithmic Mapping

  Map 1: Annual Precipitation, Washington State Map 1 is an Isarithmic map that follows the continuous phenomenon of rainfall in Washington state over a 30 year period. The data was created by the PRISM group at the Oregon State University in 2006, and then downloaded and amended by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Geospatial Management Center in 2012. Eden Santiago Gomez, analyzed the data on 5/2/2021, to create the map above. Santiago Gomez created continuous tones for the data, also adding a hillshade effect. She then converted the floating raster data into Integer data via the geoprocessing tool Int (Spatial Analyst Tool) to bring out hypsometric tinting. Lastly, she added contours of the data via the Contour List tool.   How the precipitation data was derived and interpolated? The PRISM system has been continually developed over the past couple decades, utilizing physiographical maps and climate fingerprints as its ...

Choropleth and Dot Mapping

 This week we explored choropleth and dot mapping. Choropleth is a thematic form of mapping that focuses on color units, whose color intensity is proportional to its corresponding data value. Dot mapping is also thematic. It uses either a proportional or graduated thematic symbol (like a circle), whose size increases due to its data value. Using ArcGIS pro, I analyzed the population densities of countries in Europe (person per square kilometer), as well as their wine consumption (liters per capita) to determine if there was a correlation between the two. In my choropleth map, I decided to use a natural breaks classification. I chose not to use Equal Interval because only 2 classes (with slight 3 rd class) were represented in the map, and it looked like almost just one color in the lower range. The standard deviation classification appeared to be more diverse at first glance but was actually skewed to the top ranges. I was then between Quantile and Natural Breaks. While both t...