Skip to main content

Different Map Classification Methods

 This week we learned about the different map data classification methods: equal intervals, quantile, standard deviation, and natural breaks. Utilizing these different methods, I analyzed how these methods highlight and possible skew different aspects of data while also comparing these same methods to normalized data tracts by area. 

1. Equal Interval: In this classification method, you divide your max value by your desired number of categories. When analyzing our data, this method causes a huge skew in the data where most all of the data landed in the first category.

2. Quantile: This method looks to create an equal number of observations within the number of desired categories. This method helped to display the data in the most diverse way possible.

3. Standard Deviation: This method uses the bell curve and standard deviation to create 5 categories with +/- .5, 1.5, >/< 1.5 standard deviation from the mean. This method helps to visually see how the data various from the mean in one direction or the other. This method demonstrated that there was a pretty good bell curve with not much data skewed either way.

4. Natural Break: this method seeks to group together like values to accentuate the inter-class variance. This method closely represented the Quantile method as well, but this method did not have as much observations in the upper range, with most of the data in the lower two ranges. This showed that most of the population fell beneath the 12.9% category.

"Which classification method do you think best displays the data for an audience looking to target the senior citizen population? Explain why."

I would recommend the Natural Breaks method, as this shows the biggest natural differences/jumps between percentage groups. This will help them to accurately pinpoint areas with high levels of seniors.

Figure 1: Senior Population Distribution of Seniors in Miami Dade County, Florida by percent of age 65+. 

Figure 2: Senior Population Distribution of Seniors in Miami Dade County, Florida by normalized area tracts, per sq mile. 

"If you were presenting data to the Miami Dade County Commissioners regarding the distribution of senior citizens, which data presentation do you think more accurately depicts the distribution?—the percent above 65 or the population count normalized by area?"

I would recommend the normalized data by area, because without actively comparing the percentage to the size it covers, one makes a decision without being fully informed. For example, 1% of 10 sq miles is a much greater number than 5% of 1000 sq miles. If you were looking at just the percentages in the percent above 65 models, you would think 5% is greater. 


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bivariate Choropleth and Proportional Symbols

In the first part of this lab, we used proportional symbols to represent positive and negative values in job increases/decreases in the USA.  Because there were negative values in this data set, I created a new map to "fix" the data. In this new map, I created a new field and copied the negative job loss data. I then used the Calculate field data and multiplied it by one to make it positive. Lastly, I overlaid both maps on the data and was able to accurately represent the increase and decrease of jobs in the USA by state.   In the second part of this lab, we delved into how to prepare data for a bivariate choropleth map, choose colors for the legend, and create a good layout.  I created three separate fields to analyze the data: Class Obese, Class Inactivity, and Class Final. I used the symbology tool to create 3 Quantile for the Obese and Inactivity classes and used each quantile to set the three classifications in the fields I created using the Select by Attributes...
Post a Comment
Read more

Positional Accuracy: NSSDA

 In this analysis, I compared the street and road intersect data collected for Alburquerque, NM by the City of Alburquerque and the application StreetMaps. I used an orthophoto base layer as the reference for this analysis, to compare and determine the accuracy of both the City and Streetmap layers using NSSDA procedures. The most difficult part of this analysis for me was how to determine what 20% per quadrant looks like. Because the reference map was divided into 208 quadrants, I had to determine how to subdivide all the quadrant's equality into 20%. After multiple trials and error, I decided to subdivide the entire area (208 sub-quadrants) into 4 equal-area subsections. In this way, I could do 5 random right intersection points per subsection or 20% per subsection.  Map 1: City of Albuquerque city map data.  Map 2: City of Alburquerque SteetMap data When selecting a random intersection to place the points within each quadrant, I choose a location that had data f...
Post a Comment
Read more

Infographic's

 This week was a fun and challenging week as we learned about and created infographics. It was fun to create the infographics themselves, but challenging to figure out the best methods and practices in analyzing raw data.  We used 2018 County Health Rankings National Data from countyhealthrankings.org. I chose to move forward with the two values: Unhealthy Mental Days and Premature Dealth.  I   choose these two variables because those that struggle with mental health die before their time due to depression, anxiety, and/or a combination of similar issues. Both variables are normalized by relating their value to all counties within each state in the USA. For example, the poor mental health days is normalized as the average number of reported mentally unhealthy days per month per ctizen. The normalized premature rate is the “age-adjusted years of potential life lost rate per 100,000.”  Below, I created a scatterplot of the normalized data.  I choose to k...
Post a Comment
Read more