Skip to main content

Map Critique

 This week in Computer Cartography, we learned about the 20 golden rules, "Tufteisms", of map-making. Using these criteria I chose and analyzed two different maps, one good map and one bad map, and explained why they were good or bad. Below you can see the two maps that I analyzed. 

Map A, although very informative, was too busy and hard to read. The map below accurately depicted the data but the color scheme was too bright and would have benefited from light colors that would hurt the eyes less and allow one to read the streets more easily. Additionally, this map did not have any titles or scales; I had to research where/what this map was describing. This map does not follow rule #1 "Graphical excellence is the well-designed presentation of interesting data," or rule #7 "Clear, detailed, and thorough labeling should be used to defeat graphical distortion and ambiguity."

Map A: Bus routes for a city in England. 

Map B did a great job of depicting their data. The information is easy to distinguish and read. I can easily see what type of information is being presented. I really like that although they present the data by two categories, county and state, it doesn't overcrowd the map; following rule #18 Forgo chart junk. The elements define the borders of the map and work with color categories to bring the information across to the reader achieving rule # 5, "Graphical excellence requires telling the truth about the data."

Map B: Largest Ancestry Population in USA counties and states in 2000. 








Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Positional Accuracy: NSSDA

 In this analysis, I compared the street and road intersect data collected for Alburquerque, NM by the City of Alburquerque and the application StreetMaps. I used an orthophoto base layer as the reference for this analysis, to compare and determine the accuracy of both the City and Streetmap layers using NSSDA procedures. The most difficult part of this analysis for me was how to determine what 20% per quadrant looks like. Because the reference map was divided into 208 quadrants, I had to determine how to subdivide all the quadrant's equality into 20%. After multiple trials and error, I decided to subdivide the entire area (208 sub-quadrants) into 4 equal-area subsections. In this way, I could do 5 random right intersection points per subsection or 20% per subsection.  Map 1: City of Albuquerque city map data.  Map 2: City of Alburquerque SteetMap data When selecting a random intersection to place the points within each quadrant, I choose a location that had data f...
Post a Comment
Read more

Isarithmic Mapping

  Map 1: Annual Precipitation, Washington State Map 1 is an Isarithmic map that follows the continuous phenomenon of rainfall in Washington state over a 30 year period. The data was created by the PRISM group at the Oregon State University in 2006, and then downloaded and amended by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Geospatial Management Center in 2012. Eden Santiago Gomez, analyzed the data on 5/2/2021, to create the map above. Santiago Gomez created continuous tones for the data, also adding a hillshade effect. She then converted the floating raster data into Integer data via the geoprocessing tool Int (Spatial Analyst Tool) to bring out hypsometric tinting. Lastly, she added contours of the data via the Contour List tool.   How the precipitation data was derived and interpolated? The PRISM system has been continually developed over the past couple decades, utilizing physiographical maps and climate fingerprints as its ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Supervised Classification

 This week we learned how to perform supervised and unsupervised classification on ERDAS Imagine. On the figure 1 map below, you can see my attempt at classifying land use/cover of Germantown, Maryland. This week my map falls short of the assignment goals, as I was not able to get ArcGIS pro to replicate the recoded feature classification outputs I performed in ERDAS. I am not sure what I did wrong, but in the future, I will make sure to analyze signature points more carefully via their histograms and mean plots to identify potential errors.  Figure 1: Supervised classification of Germantown, Maryland with a smaller distance map of the main feature map. 
Post a Comment
Read more