Skip to main content

Map Critique

 This week in Computer Cartography, we learned about the 20 golden rules, "Tufteisms", of map-making. Using these criteria I chose and analyzed two different maps, one good map and one bad map, and explained why they were good or bad. Below you can see the two maps that I analyzed. 

Map A, although very informative, was too busy and hard to read. The map below accurately depicted the data but the color scheme was too bright and would have benefited from light colors that would hurt the eyes less and allow one to read the streets more easily. Additionally, this map did not have any titles or scales; I had to research where/what this map was describing. This map does not follow rule #1 "Graphical excellence is the well-designed presentation of interesting data," or rule #7 "Clear, detailed, and thorough labeling should be used to defeat graphical distortion and ambiguity."

Map A: Bus routes for a city in England. 

Map B did a great job of depicting their data. The information is easy to distinguish and read. I can easily see what type of information is being presented. I really like that although they present the data by two categories, county and state, it doesn't overcrowd the map; following rule #18 Forgo chart junk. The elements define the borders of the map and work with color categories to bring the information across to the reader achieving rule # 5, "Graphical excellence requires telling the truth about the data."

Map B: Largest Ancestry Population in USA counties and states in 2000. 








Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Utilizing ERDAS Imagine to Analyze Map Features

 This week we learned how to utilize histograms and different bands to highlight different features in a map. On the following map that we worked on, dark bodies of water caused high peaks on the left of histograms while snow-peaked mountains were small blips on the far right. These simple distinctions help to quickly identify map features on a graph, that you can then utilize as a stepping stone to finding them on the image. I found it incredibly interesting how the different band layers highlighted different features on the map. Figure 1 below depicts three different features we found on the image.  Figure 1: Distinct features found on an image using ERDAS Imagine. Feature 1: Large body of water. Feature 2: Snow-capped mountains transitioning to thick vegetation. Feature 3: Shallow turbulent body of water near urbanized land, transitioning to deep calm body of water. 
Post a Comment
Read more

Positional Accuracy: NSSDA

 In this analysis, I compared the street and road intersect data collected for Alburquerque, NM by the City of Alburquerque and the application StreetMaps. I used an orthophoto base layer as the reference for this analysis, to compare and determine the accuracy of both the City and Streetmap layers using NSSDA procedures. The most difficult part of this analysis for me was how to determine what 20% per quadrant looks like. Because the reference map was divided into 208 quadrants, I had to determine how to subdivide all the quadrant's equality into 20%. After multiple trials and error, I decided to subdivide the entire area (208 sub-quadrants) into 4 equal-area subsections. In this way, I could do 5 random right intersection points per subsection or 20% per subsection.  Map 1: City of Albuquerque city map data.  Map 2: City of Alburquerque SteetMap data When selecting a random intersection to place the points within each quadrant, I choose a location that had data f...
Post a Comment
Read more

Scale Effect and Spatial Data Aggregation

 In this lab we first looked at how the scale at which we analyze data can affect geometric properties. Looking at data at three different scales (1:1200, 1:24000, 1:100000) I was surprised by my final calculations. I thought that there would be a lineal proportional relationship along the scales, but I did not find this. It makes sense that the greatest resolution [1:1200] would have the most detail of geometric properties, but I was surprised that 1:100000 had greater geometric properties than the medium resolution. I resampled the data using the Bilinear technique and found the following effect on DEM resolution.  As DEM resolution increases the average slope in degrees decreases. This makes sense because as you get closer, more in detail by getting closer, you are zooming in as actively seeing less features altogether.  In the last part of the lab, we looked into the Gerrymandering of districts in the USA. Gerrymandering essentially breaks up congressional distri...
Post a Comment
Read more